Educate. Connect. Inspire

Educate. Connect. Inspire
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Showing posts with label sustainable developemnt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sustainable developemnt. Show all posts

Apr 15, 2014

Nektarina Recap



Written by Anam Gill

Originated in 1968 the idea of sustainable development to be incorporated in a charter by Maurice Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev led to a lot of organisations stepping forward and try to make it a reality. The charter was created by a global consultation process endorsed by various organisations, representing the hope of millions to work towards a sustainable future which focuses on the well- being of human family at large.

It comprised not only of global connectivity which we as a human race have been sharing for a long time rather it also obligated to keep in mind the future of mother earth along in it's struggle for a better world for future generations.

On this road to forming a sustainable global community Nektarina founded in 2009, wanted to carry this message forward. The message was simple which is to create a sustainable global community respecting nature, human rights, economic justice that promotes a culture of peace. The only hindrance now was making it a reality not letting the message get distorted on the way like the Chinese whisper.

Mustering up courage along with other organisations Nektarina wanted to implement the four basic principles of Earth Charter in all it's projects since it’s inception. Enthusiastic to make a difference and ardent to make a positive contribution it developed projects that aimed at engaging people from all over the word, declaring responsibility to one another, the greater community of human existence and to future generations.

Projects like Nektarina Connect through Art, My Planet and Me and Nektarina Visual Essays invited people from all over the globe to participate using non formal, participatory methods like the medium of arts to express themselves focusing on caring for community with love, understanding and compassion. Young people, women and children participated wholeheartedly in all these projects. Using sustainable art that comprise the use of various mediums like photography, painting  etc to engage people, raise awareness, helping them to improve their lives and communities with a better understanding of living in a global community that disseminates the message of protecting the environment .

21st century is a century of peaceful coexistence. We must acknowledge the fact that we live in a pluralistic, diverse world. We stand at a moment in Earth’s history where we must choose our future. The future holds great perils and promises simultaneously as the world becomes increasingly interdependent. To move forward we must keep in mind that as a human family and earth community we must move forward with a common destiny. Bringing forth a sustainable global society that is founded on the values of universal human rights, respect for nature , economic security and justice and a culture of peace we must join together.


Keeping in mind the first principle of the charter that is respecting and caring for the community of life, Nektarina engaged various communities in all it’s projects focusing especially on the Roma rights.  The Roma people have been segregated since a long time and integrating them into the mainstream is a challenge in Europe. The campaigns and projects of Nektarina rejects the isolation of communities based on ethnicity, cast, creed and religion. Moving on with empathy, compassion and love to build just societies has been an essential objective of Nektarina. Projects like Connecting Through Art and Nektarina Web Magazine invites people encouraged everyone to voice their opinion. Connect through Art was a space especially for women from conflict areas to express themselves using art forms. Moreover the Visual Essay competition especially invited young people engaging them to learn more about issues relevant to their communities. To express their thoughts in creative visual styles invitations were sent to around 300 educational institutions from all over the world. Young people were asked to contribute on the issues of human rights, minorities, environment and integration.

Nektarina’s various educational campaigns centre on recycling, reducing carbon footprint and development of sustainable cities keeping in mind the ecological integrity principle of Earth Charter. The campaigns focused on protecting Earth ecological systems preventing harm as the best method to protect the environment.  To advance the study of ecological sustainability promoting open exchange and application of acquired knowledge Nektarina has dedicated a space for the publication of researches, articles, and other publications that stresses on the need to adopt patterns of production, utilization and reproduction that safeguards the ecological system.  All Nektarina’s publications including the web magazine are for everyone under creative commons licensing. The essential aspect behind these various projects and publications is to connect people from across the globe to share ideas, educating and inspiring them to work for a peaceful global community.

To promote social and economic justice strengthening democratic institutions and promoting a culture of peace and non-violence Nektarina came up with an initiative Education for Sustainability. The aim of this initiative is to make sustainability part of the educational institution’s curriculum. To inculcate in children the importance of a sustainable world that safeguards their future. Education plays a vital role in human development. Educating young people which will enable them to gain an understanding, knowledge, values and skills and address environmental and social changes issues. Education for sustainability is a step forward to include sustainable education in the “official” curriculum with the help of education ministries and departments, institutions and councils and boards relevant to the field of education around the world.

Children of today are our future, our hope for a better world. Letting them learn to think ecologically and developing a capacity to apply this understanding effectively to develop better communities is an essential measure in today’s age and time.  A true sustainable community is diverse, dynamic and continuously evolving. Starting off by educating children encourages us to dream and hope for thriving, sustainable human communities. We can learn this from the nature’s ecosystems which are sustainable communities of animals, microorganisms and plants. Education itself centres on environmental or sustainable education where students are taught that they are a part of natural world, now they should also be taught to protect the natural world. 
In Pakistan the local education ministry at provincial level tried to incorporate value education which was related to sustainable education in the public schools. With limited resources they developed curriculum and trained the teachers to pass on the knowledge of how children can take small steps that will make a big difference. Those small steps starts from saving energy my switching of unwanted lights, closing the water taps while brushing, keeping a litter free environment to the importance of recycling to name a few. 

A curriculum especially designed to impart knowledge on waste management, protecting the forests, looking after each other and thinking about a greater community, a global community will equip the children with a better understanding of the world. The project Education for Sustainability is in line with the fundamental principle of Earth Charter that talks about Integration of knowledge, values and skills needed for sustainable living into formal education. The importance of educating children to understand and act on the issues of sustainable world was seconded at Earth Summit. Keeping in mind that today’s students will be tomorrow’s leaders and decision makers helping them engage in debates , letting them acquire a better understanding of the world and global community will be a positive step for the future.  

We live in a unique time in history where the technological advancements are prodigious. These advancements added both to the progress and recession of world communities. Keeping in mind this juxtaposition we need to work towards an impact that only contributes positively. Living in a globalized world where the distances are becoming less with each passing year, globalization is bringing people and cultures together. We have transcended the geographical and national boundaries in communication.  This definitely proves the point that we are at stage where the problems associated with the Earth are no longer affecting one region or group of people rather we all are affected equally by the problems that affects the marginalised groups more. This is an important time in history where we have to take each other with us on our struggle to build a better world.

The Earth Charter is based on intercultural dialogue fostering the need for unified responsibility. Nektarina has been acting on this principle of integration. Nektarina comprises  of a multicultural team from all over the world including Pakistan, Croatia, France, India, Fiji, Trinidad & Tobago, Spain and people working in Nektarina have travelled extensively getting to know various cultures, equipping themselves with a better understanding of the world communities. Nektarina in upholding the Earth Charter principle of mutual respect and understanding by giving equal opportunity to everyone involved in it’s mission.


The principles and values in the Earth Charter reflect the influence of a rich diversity. The vision of shared values in the Earth Charter is especially focused on environment.  However, the inclusion of ethical vision reflecting the realization that political, socio-economic and cultural challenges are interrelated. Nektarina is trying it’s best to take everything together keeping in mind all the principles. Nektarina recognizes the interconnections between human rights and protection of ecosystems promoting a culture of justice and peace. This holistic understanding is reflected through Nektarina’s various projects and campaigns that do constitute sustainable development in it’s core.


At the heart of the Earth Charter is a tenet of respect for life on the recognition that all beings are inter-reliant and all life forms have value irrespective of their worth to individuals. Beginning with an attitude of respect for others and finding expression in caring, preventing harm and promoting well-being these tenets inculcate a sense of ethical responsibility. Earth Charter encourages everyone to identify with the global community as well as their local communities and to be compassionate towards the entire human family.

The ethics of Earth Charter and Nektarina are grounded in a shared vision of widely shared responsibility for the planet Earth and it’s inhabitants. Nektarina does believe that human existence is about being more not having more. The shared values between Nektarina and Earth Charter do focus special attention on the environment.  The vision is inclusive realizing that all global challenges facing the world today are interrelated. Nektarina asserts that the spirit of human solidarity lies in the kinship with all life, mutual understanding and gratitude. Keeping in mind the Earth Charter principles Nektarina believes in the vision of a peaceful and just world celebrating life joyfully.

Sep 19, 2013

Nektarina (S)pace September Issue is out! Enjoy reading!







Aug 16, 2013

Nektarina (S)pace August issue is out, enjoy!







Apr 19, 2013

Application Open: SustainUS Youth Delegation to COP19

(shared post)



Dear colleagues,

Competitive applications for SustainUS's youth delegation to the UNFCCC COP19 negotiations are now available. If you know US youth, or international youth studying or working in the USA, please pass this along and encourage them to apply.

Please find the announcement and link to the application page below:


Join the SustainUS delegation to the UN Climate Change negotiations!

The SustainUS Agents of Change (AoC) program is now accepting applications to join our youth delegation to the 19th Session of the Conference of Parties (COP 19) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The conference will take place November 11-22, 2013 in Warsaw, Poland.

Selected delegates will have the opportunity to work with government officials, scientists, civil society representatives, and youth from around the world. In the past, AoC climate delegates have presented case studies and policy statements on behalf of youth; participated in forums with fellow representatives of civil society; and met with government delegates, international organizations, and the US State Department. Delegates will work as a team in advance of the conference to influence key State Department officials and connect with the larger youth climate movement, both in the United State and around the world.

The COP 19 delegation is especially important because of the UNFCCC’s goal of negotiating a new global climate deal by 2015.  This leaves less than three years to find a pathway to accomplish an ambitious global agreement.  While COP 19 delegates will not see the end results of a global agreement, they will be essential in shaping SustainUS’s longer term strategy for the next several years.

Find out more and apply before May 12th at sustainus.org/apply-cop19.  Please direct questions to AoC coordinators Alyssa Tsuchiya and Yi Wang at agents[at]sustainus.org. We look forward to receiving your application soon!

ABOUT SUSTAINUS

SustainUS is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization of young people ages 13-26 advancing sustainable development and youth empowerment in the United States. Through proactive education and advocacy at the policymaking and grassroots levels, SustainUS members are building a future in which all people recognize the inherent equality and interdependence of social, economic, and environmental sustainability. We strive to reflect our values through the diversity of members and projects, our ongoing commitment to educating ourselves and others, and the way we live our lives. Learn more at sustainus.org.

Feb 7, 2013

26th PhD Workshop on International Climate Policy Studies in Economics, Politics & Social sciences


 The European PhD Network on International Climate Policy –
in collaboration with EDF R&D, CDC Climat, KIC Climate
    




26th PhD Workshop on International Climate Policy
Studies in economics, politics & social sciences

25-26 April 2013Paris, France

Call for Papers

The 26th PhD Workshop on International Climate Policy (ICP) will take place in Paris on April 25-26, 2013.

The ICP workshops series is organized semi-annually under the auspices of the European PhD Network on International Climate Policy. It aims to offer doctoral candidates the opportunity to present their research ideas and results, receive feedback, and exchange information and assistance in an informal and interdisciplinary setting. PhD students from all disciplines working on topics relevant to climate policy and environmental economics are invited to submit applications.

The 26th ICP workshop will cover topics of relevance for climate change mitigation and adaptation, such as:

  • climate change and energy economics
  • media and discourse research on climate change policies
  • construction of climate change representations
  • science-policy interface
  • politics, policies, polity and public opinion
  • climate change negotiations and new climate governance architectures
  • policy instrument design and market mechanisms

Participation is free of charge, but workshop participants are expected to cover their travel and accommodation expenses. Active participation is required by presenting a paper and/or by serving as a discussant for a paper presented by a fellow PhD candidate. To apply for the workshop, please submit the application form available on the workshop’s website (https://sites.google.com/site/26icpphdworkshop). If you intend to present a paper, please add an informative abstract of 300 to 500 words. Please send your documents via email to 26icpworkshop@gmail.com by February 15, 2013. Notification of acceptance/rejection will be given by March 1st, and full papers will be due by April 10, 2013.

We look forward to welcoming you in Paris.

The organizing committee:

Claire-Marie Bono, Jérémy Bouillet, Oskar Lecuyer, Marion Mauger-Parat, Marie Renner, Romain Riollet.

Please feel free to spread this announcement to PhD students from your network who might be interested!
26th ICP PhD workshop organizing committee

Dec 14, 2012

In the spotlight: sustainable development documentaries from South America


A new project by the French association Ekidina is ready to launch. And because it has to do with sustainable development, we decided to share their story. Below is a description of the project taken from the Ekidina website.

The project consists in creating web documentaries shot in South America. The ProDAs series invites you in a excting trip and in the same time pass on a message relating to three topics:
  • The sustainable agriculture: familial agriculture, traditional agriculture, intensive and capitalist agriculture
  • The ecological urban planning: Urban and peri-urban agriculture, green roofs, ecological corridors, ecodistricts
  • The renewable energies: Big and micro hydraulic, solar energies, biomass energy, renewable energies used in agriculture

1st OBJECTIVE : To sensitize to the environment damages caused by the quick economic emergence of South America for 3 decades

2nd OBJECTIVE : To make us think about sustainable solutions in keys sectors (food, energy, urban planning)

3d OBJECTIVE : To tie the actors they have met (NGO, associations, companies,...) andn connecting them thanks to their website.

The trip started on January, 10th and finished on February, 20th. Here is the map of the trip :


The 6 web-documentaries will be from 10 to 15 min long and will be weekly broadcasted starting January 2013.

Ekidina wants to offer its audience short and dynamic web documentaries in which everyone can get away and at the same time discover astonishing sustainable projects.

For a quick overview you can take a peek at the documentairies' trailer here: http://www.ekidina.org/index.php/en/documentaries/trailer

Image source: http://www.ekidina.org/index.php/en/prodas-pictures#g_1_0

Oct 19, 2012

Rounding up a busy week




By Yula Pannadopoulos


What a week! So much stuff going on at once, it's just amazing, and intoxicating, and such an inspiration!

We moved forward with the project, and we are now en route to initiating some serious dialogue. We will get to all of the countries eventually, but we decided to start with The Baltic Countries (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania), and with Slovenia, Slovakia and Czech Repulic. We didn't just randomly pick those countries - these are the countries that have been the most responsive during the implementation of our previous projects, and we thought they might do the same this time around too :) (the truth is, we already got some very positive response from some of them, so "yay!")
 
If you'd like to join the project, either as a supporter, or as a volunteer or a partner organization, please check out our Join us tab, and do join in - we'd love to have you on board!

This week we spoke about volunteering, and about the importance of working together, not just as a project team, but as communities, as people. It is then when we are able to make a difference, and it is then when we realize that changing things for the better IS possible, if we work together towards the same goal.

On October 15th we joined Blog Action Day, and we blogged about our perspective on the "power of We".

Not to be overlooked - this week the international community marked the World Food Day, and that alone is a good enough reason for us to go back to our posts "How are we going to feed the world?" and "Sense and Sensibility".

"Whether we talk about education, energy, agriculture or any other sector, they all have in common one thing that can define their main direction and purpose: a dedicated set of policies and regulations. They are the drivers of change and their effects can impact the society and even the world as a whole in multiple ways.", says, among other things, our blog post on policies.

Policies, whether educational or environmental, will be discussed further during the implementation of this project, whether it's us commenting, blogging or providing information, or whether we are discussing them with a governmental official, a local expert, or a colleague from another organization. Some information about different policies can be found even now, in the project's Wiki.
Speaking of Wiki - it got a bit of a facial :) , so hopefully looks more clear and "browseable" now, and we will keep improving it as we go along.

And then, there are plans for next week, and the weeks to come, but we'll let you in on them soon enough. In the meantime, enjoy your Friday, and have a great weekend!


Photo credits Nektarina Non Profit, taken at Zagreb, Croatia

Forward, upward, onward



Posted by Team E4S

We are delighted to announce that as of Monday, October 15th 2012, our project Education for Sustainability will move into its third phase.
Education for Sustainability is a global initiative, started in September 2011 by Nektarina Non Profit, to put sustainability on the curriculum of every school. It brings together communities and individuals, governments, organizations, businesses and the educational community itself to ensure children have the skills to become citizens of a sustainable world.
People and the planet were (and are) interconnected, but more often than not people were focused only on their own development, advancement and well being, treating the nature as a resource, when they should have been treating it as a natural partner.

At any stage of human development and progress, education played the major role. Without education change is seldom possible.

Today we find ourselves at a point where our planet has been severely damaged, from its ecosystems, to the ozone layer. Today it is clear that if we are to have any chance of preserving this planet for the future generations, we need to focus our time, effort and resources on educating people - children and youth in particular - on sustainable development, sustainable living and sustainable future.

 The project Education for Sustainability aims to help introduce Sustainable Development (and/or any similar subject that may have a different name, but focuses on sustainable living, practices and futures) in schools’ curricula in countries and regions where that is not yet the case.

Education for Sustainability project targets Ministries and Departments of Education, Schools’ Councils and Boards – the decision makers when it comes to “official” education. However, at the end of the day, education and its imprint on each individual impacts greatly the society as a whole. That is why we are also addressing local communities, parents’ groups and general population – we need their help (and yours) to reach our goal.  


Implementing the Project

We are working with local experts, agencies of environment, civil society organizations, schools and volunteers on understanding the local circumstances of any given country, and on compiling, presenting and sharing data, research and facts that will help us explain and advocate the purpose of the project – introducing Sustainable Development in schools’ curricula. The preparatory phase for the project started in September 2011 and was completed in May 2012. During the preparatory phase an extensive research was done on environmental issues in each country, on its educational system, legislative framework and decision making process. We also used that period to develop a network of partners, local experts, communities and civil society organizations that will work with us on the implementation of the project. The content phase started in May 2012, and was completed in September 2012. During that time we launched project's website and worked on its content, including the project's Wiki.

Finally - we have reached the phase where we are entering a constructive dialogue with the Governments and Ministries of Education, working together with them, but also with schools, local communities and international institutions on finding the best way to provide children and youth with an opportunity to learn about sustainable development and sustainable way of life during their formal education. This implementation phase will last until the end of 2015. We will start by focusing on European countries, and then move towards other continents, Asia, Central and South America and Africa in particular.

We are proud by what we have accomplished thus far, and even prouder to say that 65% of all activities related to this project are performed by volunteers and experts working pro-bono. We are extremely grateful to them, but also to everyone on our full-time team- without their perseverance, hard work, ideas, brainstorming, arguments and mutual challenges, we wouldn't have gotten this far.

We are also so very proud to have all of you as our supporters, partners, backers and, most importantly, friends. THANK YOU. We appreciate your help and support, and we will appreciate them even more in the months and years to come, in our joint effort to make formal education more environmentally and future oriented.  


Forward, upward, onward!
 
Your E4S Project team together with the fab volunteers    



Photo credits Nektarina Non Profit, taken at Doha, Qatar

Oct 4, 2012

Notes from the Global Conference on Sustainable Development / Evian 2012


By Yula Pannadopoulos

The last week of September was marked by the Global Conference on Sustainable Development, organized by PlanetWorkshops in Evian, France, and under the high patronage of the French Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy, and under the patronage of the Representation in France of the European Commission.

In a time when globalization has become a reality for all and civil society progressively gains influence, it is necessary to implement a constructive approach in order to achieve efficient and shared solutions. "Cooperation", "Stakeholders collaboration", "Collective intelligence"are now the core subjects of a required action. How can we structure this ideal of dialogue between all actors of society without denying the advantage of competition?

The international multilateral system now seems inadequate regarding the needed answers to current challenges.
The evolution of economic models is a real opportunity for extraordinary cooperation. However, the crisis we are experiencing have awaken protectionist reflexes. Climate and biodiversity are two examples of common goods for which construction has been sacrificed to the competition logic. How can we conciliate logic of competition and need for collaboration?

On a financial, technological and social point of view, solutions already exist to co-construct the urgently needed changes. They imply deep modications in our attitudes and represent real revolutions. 

If access to energy is a major issue, the question of energy management is equally important. A better management of energy production and consumption allows re-thinking our places of life and our territories. Thus, how can energy management be an asset to building sustainable territories?

Every year, millions of people choose to settle in cities or suburbs of big urban areas. Wishing to access employment and basic service and to improve the quality of life, the world's population is attracted by urban life. However, some of these urban spaces can no longer meet the basic needs of these populations. But is a desirable urban ecosystem really possible?

The consumer is today a central actor of transformation of our economic. models. Internet and social networks have become extraordinary tools for sharing information and for citizen's commitment. How can these tools become real instruments of a responsible consumption?

Facing the excesses of our production and consumption models, it is imperative to develop new business models. The low carbon economy, which aims at reducing carbon dioxide emissions, seems to be one of these new models. How could collaborative economy allow us to achieve a low carbon economy?

Town and country planning is a major component of the human environment. Spatial planning and occupation policies must favor a healthy environment, conductive to populations' well-being. How to re-think the organization of territories to improve human health?

These are just some of the issues, topics and questions raised and discussed during the conference, and the best way to experience the atmosphere of a conference dialogue is to see the videos: http://www.planetworkshops.org/en/184/planetworkshops-tv/


Photo credits: http://eesc.europa.eu


Sep 7, 2012

Liveable Cities


 
By Tjasa Oresnik

My friends and I have been, over the years, involved in many projects focusing on sustainability, protection of the environment, water and carbon footprint, preservation of forests, recycling. We still are a part of some of those projects, and we enjoy learning, collaborating, and participating. We also wanted to create a project of our own - a community project - where literally anyone can join and be a part of it, without (many) rules.

Just before this year's summer break at the University, we got together with Nektarina Non Profit's team, and they invited us to join their project idea Liveable Cities, and me and my friends were thrilled with the idea 

Liveable Cities is a 12 month volunteer project sharing (at least) 365 blog posts from people all over the world, giving us their vision of a (more) liveable city. The project's objective is to explore, research and share practices, ideas and developments in the urban areas across the world, focusing on sustainability, quality of life, climate change mitigation and adaptation, water and air quality, pollution, waste management, low carbon transport, recycling, energy efficiency, renewable energies, co-operatives, environment and green areas, ecosystems and biodiversity.

"Great. But what does it actually mean.", I can hear you ask. We actually want to give a platform for anyone and everyone to express their thoughts, visions, concerns, ideas, projects and practices about how they see the city of the future - a sustainable, environmentally conscious city. What we want to create is a platform for a dialogue, a place for people to engage into a conversation, a forum, if you will, enabling everyone to express themselves in any format, really - writing, photography, video, design, multimedia, art. We would like you - all of you - to join us and help us create a set of ideas, stories and images for a better, healthier and more sustainable quality of life in our urban habitats.

Send us your thoughts, ideas, blogs, photographs, anything and everything regarding urban habitats, green city life, urban sustainability or any related topic, really (or just subscribe to our fab weekly newsletter!).

Our email is liveable.cities@nektarinanonprofit.com

Let's create better, more liveable cities together! :)




Photo credits Nektarina Non Profit / Taken at Lugano, Switzerland

Aug 17, 2012

Education for Sustainability


By Yula Pannadopoulos

It's been a long way coming, but our new project is finally online! After nine months of research, information gathering, field planning, consulting and organizing, we are now deep into the field work, working together with communities, schools, ministries and governments. Our goal? Putting Sustainable development on the curriculum of every school.

Here is more information:


Education for Sustainability  is an initiative to put sustainability on the curriculum of every school. It brings together communities and individuals, governments, organizations, businesses and the educational community itself to ensure children have the skills to become citizens of a sustainable world.

Project Summary

People and the planet Earth have been interconnected throughout all stages of human development, from the first irrigation systems in Mesopotamia, across the industrial revolution in the 18th and 19th century, right to this ultra modern era.

People and the planet were (and are) interconnected, but more often than not people were focused only on their own development, advancement and well being, treating the nature as a resource, when they should have been treating it as a natural partner.

At any stage of human development and progress, education played the major role. Without education change is seldom possible.

Today we find ourselves at a point where our planet has been severely damaged, from its ecosystems, to the ozone layer. Today it is clear that the increasing climate change we are witnessing is caused by people. Today it is clear that if we are to have any chance of preserving this planet for the future generations, we need to focus our time, effort and resources on educating people - children and youth in particular - on sustainable development, sustainable living and sustainable future.

The project Education for Sustainability aims to help introduce Sustainable Development (and/or any similar subject that may have a different name, but focuses on sustainable living, practices and futures) in schools’ curricula in countries and regions where that is not yet the case.

Education for Sustainability project targets Ministries and Departments of Education, Schools’ Councils and Boards – the decision makers when it comes to “official” education.

However, at the end of the day, education and its imprint on each individual impacts greatly the society as a whole. That is why we are also addressing local communities, parents’ groups and general population – we need their help (and yours) to reach our goal.


Implementing the Project
We are working with local experts, agencies of environment, civil society organizations, schools and volunteers on understanding the local circumstances of any given country, and on compiling, presenting and sharing data, research and facts that will help us explain and advocate the purpose of the project – introducing Sustainable Development in schools’ curricula.

The preparatory phase for the project started in September 2011 and was completed in May 2012. During the preparatory phase an extensive research was done on environmental issues in each country, on its educational system, legislative framework and decision making process.

We also used that period to develop a network of partners, local experts, communities and civil society organizations that will work with us on the implementation of the project.

When we started working on the project, we envisaged the implementation phase to last from 3 to 5 years.
(Please refer to FAQ tab for answers on specific questions about the project)


Project Background

Sustainability
The notion of ‘sustainability’ emerged in the 1980s and has now become one of the key concepts for exploring the impact of human activity on the planet. Put at its most simple any human activity is sustainable if it can continue fairly indefinitely without causing harm to either people or planet. Alternatively, any human activity that results in on-going harm to either people or planet is the opposite – unsustainable. It has now become clear that many of our practices today come in the latter category.

It was at the Earth Summit in 1992 that this vital (and contested) concept became enshrined in national and international policy and debate. This occurred because it was then recognized that human activity was increasingly threatening the biosphere – that narrow zone of earth, air and water on which all life (plants, creatures, humans) depends. It also occurred because it was recognized that issues of development, i.e. global wealth and poverty, were increasingly threatening people’s life chances in both poor and rich countries.

It is important to highlight that sustainability is about managing finite resources and striving to replace them with renewable ones.

Education for sustainability
At the Earth Summit it was also recognized that education, at all levels, had a crucial role to play in helping citizens understand and act on issues relating to the welfare of people and planet. The term ‘education for sustainable development’ (ESD) and ‘education for sustainability’ (EFS) then began to become part of educational vocabulary. There were, of course, a good number of educators who were already showing an interest in issues of sustainability/unsustainability, particularly amongst those working in environmental education, global education and futures education.

Sustainable schools
Whilst the education for sustainability can be seen as a cross-curricular theme to which all subjects could contribute, it received a significant boost when the focus was widened to the notion of ‘sustainable schools’. At one step this moved issues of sustainability from an optional element in the curriculum to a matter of whole-school policy affecting every aspect of school life.

The educational strategy on Sustainable Schools should encompass the following focus areas: food and drink; energy and water; travel and traffic; purchasing and waste; buildings and grounds; inclusion and participation; local well-being; global citizenship.

Having in mind that today’s pupils and students will be tomorrow’s decision makers, helping them engage with sustainability issues in a critical and creative manner results in greater ‘ownership’ of the issues and a willingness to engage in active citizenship now and for the future.

The website address is www.education4sustainability.org , check it out for more data, free newsletter and free wiki access, and we'll be sharing updates and information on our usual Facebook page and Twitter.

Jul 13, 2012

Blame it on Rio (or maybe not)


By Yula Pannadopoulos

Yet another conference ended, and one more time we are left with few answers, if any.  I will not go into details, and whine about what should have been done, or what could have been achieved. I am sure you all followed to the post Rio+20 press, and heard just about every negative thing about lack of will, failure to commit and so on and so forth. I will focus on the positive.

More than ever before  the UN showed that it realizes the need to adapt, to change, and to re-invent itself from an organization with a rather outdated, slow and certainly (at least for the outsiders) frustrating ways of communication to a modern, fast(er) and more open minded entity. Don't get me wrong. I don't think UN does not have an open mind in general terms - of course it does. What I meant was mostly about communication with the outside world, that, without a doubt, needs to be more 'updated' and more relaxed. (where 'updated' equals social networks, visuals and creativeness).

This year, at this conference, more than ever before, we saw (on social networks) a true, honest effort to connect, to share, to inform, and to support a dialogue. There was an amazing number of ways to engage, communicate one's thoughts, opinions, and ideas on the future one wants. Twitter and Facebook timelines were positively overwhelmed with great information, visuals, videos, and, most importantly, with messages and comments from all of us. People, and youth in particular, finally became a factor in the equation.

And maybe Rio+20 was a failure - from many perspectives it certainly was. But a wider, more open, more transparent dialogue has been opened, and it is almost impossible to reverse that fact - and that's a great thing. That's pretty awesome.

-------
Artwork by Junior Lopes via toonpool.com

Jun 14, 2012

Green Economy in Australia and North America


Australia

Australian governments at all levels have been developing and implementing policies to promote a re-engineering of the Australian economy towards lower carbon emissions, increased use of clean renewable sources of energy, the more efficient use of scarce resources, and reduced ecosystem impacts. Examples of recent policy initiatives at the Australian Government level include the Clean Energy initiative, Solar Flagships, Re-tooling for Climate Change, the Green Building Fund, and the Green Car Innovation Fund. State governments have responsibility for much of Australia’s environmental management and regulation and have a plethora of policy initiatives around environmental protection and sustainability of natural resources.

These policies broadly align with various international agreements and initiatives to promote the transition to a greener economy, including the United Nations Green Economy Initiative, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Green Jobs Initiative, and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Green Growth Strategy.



North America

Green Economy Is Not Yet Made in U.S.A.

Manufacturing, long in decline in the United States, might rise again if the green economy were 100 percent homemade. But that big “if” is not what’s happening and seems unlikely. Rather than “made in America,” much of the green manufacturing to date is “assembled in America” from parts made overseas.

The Obama administration is trying to change that, offering generous tax credits to generate domestic production. But the impact has been modest, because assembly plants qualify for the credits.

“The act says that if you assemble in the United States, then you comply,” said Tom Dyer, vice president for marketing and government policy for Kyocera Solar, a Japanese company that will assemble solar panels in San Diego from imported Japanese solar cells. “That is what we are doing, and that is what a lot of people are doing.”

Very slowly, that reliance on imports might be changing. Gamesa North America, which is Spanish-owned, makes blades and nose cones in eastern Pennsylvania for assembly into wind turbines. A new company, SpectraWatt, a spinoff from Intel, started production of solar cells last month at a factory in Fishkill, N.Y., manufacturing a component of solar panels now often imported.

Andrew B. Wilson, chief executive of SpectraWatt and a former Intel executive, said the just-opened $50 million plant could not have been built without the $20 million in public subsidies and incentives that SpectraWatt received. “If we want green manufacturing to flourish in the United States,” Mr. Wilson said, “then government support, for the time being, is necessary.”


Yet fewer than 500 applications have been filed so far for the tax breaks, and if all were approved they would add just 75,000 green manufacturing jobs, according to Robert Pollin, an economist at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, who has done studies for the administration estimating the impact. Still, he is optimistic. “Clean energy is a huge opportunity to revive manufacturing,” Mr. Pollin said.

In all, fewer than 200 factories in the United States are devoted to green production, employing no more than 15,000 workers. While the numbers are rising, many of the plants are foreign-owned, and several Democratic senators want the incentives stopped until Congress can change the law, restricting the subsidies to American-owned companies.

Whatever the ownership, assembly operations that rely on imported parts do relatively little to revive manufacturing, which represents less than 12 percent of the nation’s economic activity. (In the early 1950s, it was nearly 30 percent.) Employment in manufacturing similarly has fallen, to 11.5 million today from more than 16 million in 1953.

In the rise of green manufacturing, Asia, particularly China and Japan, dominates in solar, and Europe, particularly Germany and also Spain, in wind and high-speed rail, the latter a potentially giant industry that does not yet exist in the United States.

“Over the last 10 years we have not been competitive with Europe and Asia,” said Matt Rogers, a senior adviser in the Energy Department. “So many of the best manufacturers started there and we weren’t in the game.”

Ethan Zindler, the head of North American research for Bloomberg New Energy Finance, a consultancy, commented: “The reality is that the Europeans ramped up five years ago. And the Chinese in just the last two years have made the kind of progress that it took the Europeans five years to achieve.”



Green economy: Canada’s opportunity for prosperity

A green economy, in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication, is one of the two central themes of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development scheduled for June 2012, or Rio+20.

A nation like Canada, with its Green Energy and Economy Act and Water Opportunities Act in Ontario alongside the engagement of several provinces in the Western Climate Initiative, underlines how the green shoots of a green economy are emerging everywhere.

The challenge facing governments, cities and the private sector is how to accelerate and scale-up such transitions over the coming 20 years in both developed but also developing economies and ones that are more state or more market-led.

In Canada, Ontario’s Green Energy Act has spurred the development of local renewable energy companies including more than $9 billion in private sector investment and creating an estimated 20,000 new jobs.


Jun 11, 2012

Green Economy in Africa

Catalyzing a Green Economy in Africa

Countries still do not take full account of the costs of inaction on environmental challenges such as climate change, and inefficient use of energy and resources. Such cost of inaction can be considerable, especially for developing countries, Africa amongst them - whose economies rely more heavily on natural resources and where climate change is already hitting hardest. A new paradigm is needed to ensure that countries take better advantage of the larger potential benefits that can accompany the move towards greener economies. A paradigm which recognizes that to build a prosperous economy, “green” and “economy/growth” can no longer be considered in isolation.

In line with the principle of sustainable development, the green growth paradigm responds to the need for a new model of growth that is much less intensive in natural resources and that can lead to social well-being and poverty reduction in Africa. A major challenge in moving towards sustainable development is to balance and coordinate different interest: between economic growth/job creation and environmental integrity, between the rich and the poor, and between the present and the future generations. A green economy, by turning environmental imperatives into viable economic activities, helps reconcile the need for economic growth and the need to ensure the environmental basis for continued growth into the future. The green economy can contribute to the achievement of the MDG especially the achievement of the poverty eradication.

The Climate Change, Development & Adaptation Programme (CC DARE) jointly implemented by UNEP and UNDP and funded by the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs is using technical and financial assistance to respond to nationally defined needs of UN member states. The programme approach is premised on using timely, flexible and targeted actions which constitute a true recipe of a fiscal stimulus that offers the opportunity for triggering bigger actions within the bigger framework of national development in Africa. Using this approach in the continent has shown its appropriateness on how best to realize a low-carbon, resource efficient economy for the 21st century. The uniqueness of the programme to kick off and rollout self-driven national actions using technical and financial backstopping in overcoming immediate and urgent capacity gaps is creating an enabling environment which is most needed in spurring and fostering the green economy in the African continent and beyond. The peculiarity of the funding approach used by CC DARE is a stunning-truetestament that even with smaller funds, activities can still be implemented especially where they serves as a stimulus of targeted actions that foster green growth and remove barriers to bigger actions.

Effective green growth requires an enabling environment - one that grants the poor citizens the rights, resources and access they need to sustain and benefit from markets, natural resources amongst others. A key lesson from decades of development experience is the importance of creating appropriate policies and effective institutions at all levels to support people-centered, sustainable development, green growth. The lesson is important to apply to the green economy, given the significant overlap between the green economy and development and of course the achievement of the Millennium development goals. Granting the citizens resource rights, representation in governance processes, participation rights and fair access to markets can build the resilience of communities and help them to shift towards a sustainable economy while at the same time adapting to the changing climate. The CC DARE approach of engaging different actors/players through national and subnational levels have helped in the mobilization of national interest, national governments, civil societies which have helped created the type of enabling environment needed for the green economy in Africa. The simplified, practical, easy to implement approach utilized by this programme has shown that tackling multiple developmental needs; opportunities could emerge from the actions that fosters green growth.



Fostering a Green Economy transformation

At the 3rd African Ministerial Conference on Financing for Development in May 2009, in Kigali, Rwanda, African Ministers of Finance, Economic Planning, and Environment recognised the importance of placing the environment at the centre stage of Africa’s development process given the challenges it imposes on the continent’s achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. Ministers called for the creation of an enabling environment to support the transition towards a green economy and pursuing low carbon growth, as well as facilitating the private sector to play a crucial role in the transfer and adoption of clean technologies.

African Ministers of Environment who met at the 13th Session of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment, in Bamako, Mali, in June 2010, similarly recognized the need to take advantage of the opportunities provided by a growth and development trajectory that embraces the green economy model.

Africa’s valuable natural capital assets are critical to wealth creation, vital for its economies, and essential for poverty reduction and sustainable development. In addition, such resources are of global importance, playing a key role in the conservation and sustainable use of the earth’s biological resources, and climate change mitigation and adaptation.

African governments recognise increasingly that investments in green economic sectors, ecosystem restoration and the nurturing of natural capital can be instrumental in halting environmental degradation and also create green jobs, secure sustainable livelihoods and contribute to poverty reduction and green growth.

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/33/47670108.pdf

 
Will the green-economy train take Africa to the right destination? - by Dianna Games

Africa faces particular challenges, given that it suffers from so many development challenges already, which some fear may be made worse by trying to keep pace with the global "green" drive. The sheer weight of funding and initiatives are good reason to believe something positive may emerge from the hysteria about the world’s condition. The expectation is that Africa will benefit from new investment in technologies and infrastructure that will improve the quality and sustainability of growth.

Global action on climate change also offers an opportunity for a new engagement with African governments and policy makers on improving economic efficiency. This is all good but perhaps unrealistic given that a lack of political will to improve the economic environment has been a brake on development in the past.

The fact that all African countries are confronting challenges as a result of climate change is not a sufficient driver of change in Africa. Countries have always faced climate challenges. In a key affected sector — agriculture — issues of land tenure and associated lack of collateral and access to credit still hamper Africans’ ability to have food security.

Two of the most serious problems attributed to climate change, deforestation and land degradation, are caused largely by unchecked commercial exploitation, rural energy needs and poor farming practices.

In short, neglect and policy failure are perhaps the greatest obstacles to the development of African agriculture. The question is whether the weight brought to bear on governments to tackle climate change will get them to be more proactive about improving the way this and other sectors are managed.

We would all like to live in a greener world so there are many upsides to the focus on greener economies. African analyst and author Paul Collier told the gathering that solar power would be the next big thing in Africa, leapfrogging current energy sources in the way that mobile phones had done, as the cost of the technology came down.

But there are also many unknowns. For example, what will the effect be of climate-change initiatives on growth on a continent where the biggest new investment is in the areas that climate change proponents suggest is causing the problem — resources. ADB chief economist Mthuli Ncube says there is no tension between a green economy and resources investment. The focus, he says, will not be on discouraging new investment but rather encouraging companies to be more aware of the environmental implications of their operations. 

With all the hype about climate change, it is easy to forget the size and complexity of the challenges and the effect all of this may have on growth. A continent already hobbled by capacity constraints now faces a future filled with more complex policy challenges as countries are pushed to restructure their economies to fall in line with this global trend.

There are also concerns about other consequences of creating green economies, such as trade barriers, deindustrialisation and rising costs of doing business. And there is a lack of consensus on what a green economy actually is, which will compromise policy formulation.

But Africa is already on this fast-moving train. African ministers recently signed an agreement recognising the benefits to the continent of green economies. But it will be interesting to see if the political will to make this work matches the enthusiasm expressed in public forums.


Jun 8, 2012

Green Economy in South America

Sustainable Development, not "Green Economy"

Civil society in Latin America and the Caribbean is mustering its strength to defend the principles of sustainable development, as opposed to the model of a "green economy", which it views as only benefiting the business interests of big companies.

"The green economy is the new international environmental vogue, but it has lost all vestiges of the concept of sustainable development and has taken another direction," Maureen Santos, an expert on international issues at the Brazilian Federation of Agencies for Social and Educational Assistance (FASE), said. "It's an attempt to shore up the present system that is in crisis," she said.

The goals of the Rio+20 conference are to secure renewed political commitment for sustainable development, assess the progress to date in the implementation of the outcomes of the major summits on sustainable development, and address new and emerging challenges. The conference will focus on building a green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication, and an institutional framework for sustainable development.

"Putting a price on nature is no solution, because it isn't a commodity," Katu Arkonada, a researcher at Bolivia's Centre for Applied Studies on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, said. "The green economy must not distort or divert the basic principles of sustainable development. It is a mistake to say that people will only look after goods if they have a price-tag and an owner and generate profits."

Debate should focus on "the greening of growth, equity in a world of limits, and building resilience to shocks and stresses," says a study titled "Making Rio 2012 Work: Setting the stage for global economic, social and ecological renewal" by Alex Evans and David Steven. The authors are academics with the Centre on International Cooperation at New York University, which published the document in June 2011.

Civil society organisations prefer to talk about greening the economy, rather than promoting a green economy. In fact, these definitions are already a cause of dissension between industrialised countries and developing nations. "The debate on the green economy is very diverse. Latin American positions are very fragmented," said FASE's Santos, who is also a member of the Brazilian Network for Peoples' Integration (REBRIP).

"The two key challenges of sustainable development are, on the one hand, to overcome poverty and inequality, and on the other, to restore the balance of the Earth. Both goals are intrinsically linked, and one cannot be achieved without the other. Human beings and nature are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development," Arkonada said.

The World Economic and Social Survey 2011: The Great Green Technological Transformation, by the U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, recommends investing 1.9 trillion dollars a year in green technologies over the next 40 years, to combat the effects of climate change. "But the current green economy agenda lacks much real substance. To give it a harder edge, it should be focused more specifically on the issue of growth - above all, the growth path of emerging economies," Evans and Steven's study says.

It argues that "emerging economies will account for the majority of additional demand between now and 2030; they are laboratories of the future; they are the model that other developing countries want to follow; and they have the potential to force rich countries to make belated efforts to upgrade their economies."




Latin America defends sustainability and rejects “green economy”

Representatives of the governments of Latin America and the Caribbean who convened in October 2011 in Santiago de Chile didn’t include among their recommendations to the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, the concept of “green economy”.

On the other hand, the document of conclusions approved by the Regional Preparatory Meeting for Rio2012, reiterates that “the objective to be achieved is sustainable development, which should ensure the balance between these three interconnected pillars: social, economic and environmental, while maintaining the fundamental principles of common but differentiated responsibilities and equity”. A global institutional framework is necessary to achieve sustainable development “which is efficient and flexible and ensures the effective integration” of those pillars, it adds.

The delegates stated that a change in patterns of production and consumption must be achieved, in addition to better ways of measuring countries’ wealth that adequately reflect the social, economic and environmental dimensions, “while maintaining the fundamental principles of common but differentiated responsibilities and equity”.

Following three days of deliberations, the representatives examined the gaps still remaining since the 1992 Earth Summit for the achievement of sustainable development, which are even more pressing in the case of the small island States of the Caribbean.

Representatives of civil society organizations had called before and during the meeting to focus the debate on the principle of sustainable development and on the implementation of the commitments outlined 20 years ago in Rio de Janeiro, and not on the “green economy”, a concept that, as they warned, “has not reached a real consensus”. They also remarked on the importance of effective accountability, the observance of the agreements, participation, the precautionary principle and the improvement of institutions in charge of sustainable development.

Some governmental representatives (such as those from Barbados, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Nicaragua and Venezuela) opposed to the concept of green economy for various reasons, among them its recognition as an excessively economist approach and because of the rich countries’ technological advantages for the implementation of its policies, the absence of consensus and the perceived threat of privatization of social goods.

But other official delegations (among them the Dominican Republic, Guatemala and Mexico) perceived the green economy as a flexible means to reach a kind of sustainable development that is adaptable to national circumstances. However, the conclusions don’t include any reference to the concept.

In the conclusions of the meeting, the delegates stated that “some of the barriers to the achievement of sustainable development are the scientific and technological gap, the lack of sufficient financing and the fragmentation in implementation,” said Alicia Bárcena, executive secretary of ECLAC.

The document also indicates the need to achieve “the eradication of extreme poverty; new, additional, stable and predictable financing for supporting implementation activities in developing countries; the fulfilment of mitigation and adaptation commitments in relation to climate change and the building of resilience to its impacts; and greater South-South cooperation and exchange of successful experiences”.

They included the need for “full implementation of the right to access environmental information, participation and justice enshrined in Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development”.

Furthermore, the representatives of the States of Latin America and the Caribbean expressed their firm determination to continue to work towards sustainable development, with the primordial purpose of eradicating poverty and achieving equality in societies, bearing in mind the particular characteristics of each of the States in the region.

They reaffirmed the commitment of the countries in the region to continue to contribute constructively to a successful outcome of Rio2012 and they thanked ECLAC for its constant efforts and the support it extends to Latin American and Caribbean countries.

Jun 5, 2012

Green Economy in Asia and the Pacific


Green Economy Initiative

The Green Economy Initiative (GEI) is designed to assist governments in "greening" their economies by reshaping and refocusing policies, investments and spending towards a range of sectors, such as clean technologies, renewable energies, water services, green transportation, waste management, green buildings and sustainable agriculture and forests.

Greening the economy refers to the process of reconfiguring businesses and infrastructure to deliver better returns on natural, human and economic capital investments, while at the same time reducing greenhouse gas emissions, extracting and using less natural resources, creating less waste and reducing social disparities.

GEI activities include providing advisory services to countries interested in greening their economies, producing research products, and engaging partners to effectively promote and implement Green Economy strategies.

Activities

In Asia, UNEP works on national Green Economy initiatives in Indonesia, South Korea, Viet Nam, Cambodia, Lao, Philippines, and Papua New Guinea.

UNEP is working in partnership with the Government of the Republic of Korea to support the country's green economy strategy. Under the plan, UNEP has produced an interim report entitled, "Overview of the South Korean Green Growth National Vision." This is an independent review of the country's "Green Growth National Vision" and five-year Green Growth Plan, and is the first in a series of national and regional initiatives.

http://www.unep.org/roap/Home/tabid/roap/Activities/ResourceEfficiency/GreenEconomyInitiative/tabid/6825/Default.aspx


Green Growth

Green Growth is a policy focus for the Asia and Pacific region that emphasizes environmentally sustainable economic progress to foster low-carbon, socially inclusive development.

Green Growth is a globally relevant approach to sustainable economic growth that was developed in Asia. It is impeartive that countries in the Asia and Pacific region continue their economic growth to alleviate poverty and to achieve social progress. However, increased environmental degradation, climate change and diminishing natural resources require an unconventional approach to support the export-driven economic activities of the region.

The Asia and Pacific region has been at the forefront of the 21st century surge in economic growth, a situation driven primarily by exports and which has led to expanded production requirements needed to fuel an ever increasing amount of trade. This has significantly compounded the environmental carrying capacity pressures of many countries in the region. These countries are now shouldering an increasingly greater share of regional and global environmental production-related burdens. Coupled with evolving production patterns, these impacts are driving changes in consumption patterns in these countries and policies are needed to ensure that these developments will be environmentally sustainable. The past axiom of “grow first, clean up later”, can not apply in a region that has such a limited natural resource base and a rapidly growing population directly dependent on natural resources. In light of the recent fuel, food and financial crisis is is now imperative for countries in the region to reassess their development paths.

In order to achieve Green Growth it is crucial to change development approaches from ‘grow first, clean up later’ to a more responsible long-term attitude. Governments can promote this by encouraging economic growth with an emphasis on environmental and social concerns.

UNESCAP’s Green Growth Programme has evolved to emphasize the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach (SLA), a rights-based approach that recognizes the poor as a key stakeholder in the development process. Green Growth encourages the use of participatory assessments which identify the main constraints, opportunities and concerns faced by the poor and to include them into the policy planning and implementation cycle. The SLA supports vulnerable communities by providing pro-poor social services and by creating an enabling environment for sustainable development.

The concept of sustainable livelihoods is used by some as a replacement term for sustainable employment and work in the formal and informal economies with reference to a person’s capacity to maintain and enhance their capability and assets both now and in the future, while not undermining the natural resource base. Adopting this approach allows Green Growth to work towards win-win solutions: addressing the environment in ways which enhance opportunities for the poor to participate more fully in society and thus improving their quality of life.


Green economy key to overcoming resource constraints in Asia-Pacific

Countries in the Asia-Pacific region could overcome the constraints of limited resources by making the transition from dependence on traditional means of production to a more sustainable green economy, according to a joint report unveiled today by the United Nations and the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

The region utilizes three times as much resources to produce $1 of gross domestic product (GDP) compared to the rest of the world, and resource use in the region grew by 50 per cent between 1995 and 2005, says the report, entitled Green Growth, Resources and Resilience: Environmental Sustainability in Asia and the Pacific.


Produced by the UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and ADB ahead of the UN Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) to be held in Brazil in June, the report emphasizes that the challenges of resource constraints are more serious in the Asia-Pacific region than anywhere else.

It rejects the assumption that technology advances will be able to solve the problems of resource constraints and proposes specific strategies for changing economic incentives to promote a green economy which uses resources much more efficiently.

“Countries of Asia and the Pacific have been at the forefront of implementing initiatives to green their economic growth and will reap the benefits of such investments economically, socially and environmentally,” said Young Woo Park, UNEP’s regional director.

With the global market for green goods and services expanding rapidly and the right policies and investments, the Asia-Pacific region could lead the world towards a more sustainable future, according to Nessim Ahmad, director of ADB’s Environment and Social Safeguards Division.

The report stresses that economic incentives to promote investments in resource efficiency and natural resource protection are key, but action on other fronts is also needed, including an integrated policy framework and approaches.

Governance must be more adaptive and inclusive and become more adept at harnessing knowledge from different sources and incorporating information from various stakeholders, the report stresses.

For developing countries, the massive investments in infrastructure, as well as the unmet needs for energy, water, transportation and housing, offer a window of opportunity to change the way that energy and other resources are used, it states.

The report addresses the two main Rio+20 themes – green economy in the context of sustainable development and poverty eradication, and institutional framework for sustainable development.

“Business as usual is no longer a feasible option, but many governments and other stakeholders still do not recognize the urgency of the challenge of improving the resource efficiency of economic growth,” said Rae Kwon Chung, director of ESCAP’s environment and development division.

The Asia-Pacific region’s resource and pollution-intensive growth trends means the region is at risk of not being able to sustain the growth needed to reduce poverty in the long term, the report points out.

Optimistic growth projections for the region do not factor in resource constraints sufficiently, Mr. Chung added. Green growth, he underlined, is a strategy to achieve sustainable development, addressing both resource constraints and the climate crisis.